Flattish Earth, domed heaven, non-heliocentric

Why I believe in a non-heliocentric model of the universe.
My conviction is based on:

1.    Truth – I believe that the only artefact in this world that stood its claim of being truth is the Word. Therefore, I should take it seriously as reference and guide. And although it contains sections that cannot be taken absolutely literally, it is safer to err on the side of being a literalist.

2.    Communication Principles – one intelligent being transfer knowledge to another intelligent being – this communication is in truth void of deceit. I am referring to the hundreds of passages in the Bible referring to creation and the Biblical Cosmological model – as understood by someone that does not approach the Bible with preconceived ideas and opinions, and most importantly, how the Hebrews of old understood the model as God gave it to them.

3.    Science – EACH AND EVERY pure scientific test ever devised, tested and repeated proofs that the earth stands still and the sun, moon and stars move. For example:  the Michelson–Morley experiment, flat water – NOT ONCE did anyone observed the so-called mile-squared-times-8-inches required by the globe earth, rather the opposite, tides, and the list goes on and on and on. Hundreds of times.

4.    Logic – just be thinking a little while about the multitude of clues given in nature brings one to the conclusion that the earth is standing still. For example: mirror still water, the phases of the moon and the sun’s position relative to that, the eclipses of the moon, etc. etc.

IMHO, the heliocentric model is based purely on:

1.    Lience using the formula of Deceivance– there are ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, GEEN, NO scientific proof of the heliocentric model.  The ONLY possibility is contained maths – and one can just as easily speak truth - or lies – through that language… Even William Shatner, the actor for James Kirk, of Star Trek, acknowledges there is no difference between science fiction and science...

2.    Mathematical Impossibilities – there is NO way, not even mathematically, to explain the 666 numbers in the rotational speed of the earth, its movement around the sun, the sun’s speed through the Milky Way and the Milky Way’s speed through the universe. Nothing to measure, nothing to proof. NADA, ZILCH, ZERO. How are the elliptical orbits of the planets around the sun explained – while the sun moves? Or the extreme elliptical movements of recurring comets? The spiral tracks formed by the planets suspiciously looks like the coiling serpent around the caduceus

3.    Acknowledgement impossibility by own proponents – Michao Kaku, one of the greatest scientists in the world today acknowledges that the errors in the current cosmological model amounts to 10 to the power of 120. Unprecedented. I say: throw in to the fire and burn it until nothing remains.

4.    These Liencetists that calls themselves scientists (one in a million as Neil Degrasse-Tyson says of himself), acknowledges they know ONLY 4% of the universe! Go and have an open-heart surgery under a doctor that only knows that much of the subject? I don’t think anyone will survive! Should I choose this in lieu of the Bible? Never.

If you would like to know more, there is a study in process that considers hundreds of verses in the Bible that directly and indirectly refers to the construct of the heavens and the earth.

Watch this space.