If one argue that this verse allows the ecclesia to appoint women as leaders, then one has to ignore the specific patterns established in the first ecclesias and the specfic instructions that were given elsewhere.

However, deacons were not necessarily in authority positions. it was a helper and subservient position from the start.

Men - aner will arise, and brethren are adressed.

Strongs is by far not sufficient - it goes a long way however - but there are inflections in Hebrew that is not (always) included. Thereby, some Hebrew words may have wildly different meanings. So one depends on other experts to interpret difficult passages - and even they do not agree!

Another observation. The more one learns and discover, the more questions - sometimes very perplexing, even vexing - arise, with no easy answer in sight. The more knowledge one gains, the less certain "fixed truths" become. How YHWH meant it - so that we only trust in Him, the true source of knowledge. As an aside, an absolutely vital truth regarding AI - it MUST connect to the (dark) spirit world to have any meaning.

Thus it is very possible to be taken on a wild detour, sometimes very destructive, by extremely devious people (spirits) necessating extreme care in evaluating ANY teaching. BUT, over the years I have detected that false teachers follow similar strategies in trying to covey their specific interpretations.

One is the "skipping stone" approach where a small portion of scripture is used to form a predefined theology, and the rest of the scripture is then used (abused) to support that line of thought, rather that hte WHOLE of scripture is used to form ones understanding.

This skipping stone approach is what I believe the writer of the video narrative is doing - and the goal is nefarious and evil - fitting perfectly with the woke narrative that is overtaking the wold,

Note that Adam and Eve could eat from ALL the trees on earth, and the earth was not perfectly subdued. BOTH received the same command. And they could eat from every tree,

One of the major instructions were to procreate - the only way that humans at that stage could procreate was through sexual union. But a vexing problem rears its head, when one looks back from the ritual laws in Le and De - about the issue of bodily fluids - a man when he eject seed, and a woman in her period, both caused the person to be unclean (and it was quite serious, on the same level as the most severe form of uncleanness). Did or was Eve menstruating before the fall? Or was it as consequence of her sin? Or did the uncleanness issue came about because they effectively became unclean in total, chased from Eden?

Adam alone reveived the instruction regarding the tree of knowledge of good and evil. He was in charge to protect it.

Adam was to get a HELP MEET. So right from the get go there was an indication of hierarchy. And some part him was used to create Eve. Which? His side? Which one? And how much of his side? Half his head, breast, stomach, leg, sexual organs? Adam was not symmetrical - so either his heart was included or excluded - and that is only one example.

Then YHWH closed up the place where the part was taken from. How did He close HALF of the side? Does not make ANY sense, as YHWH had to recreate those parts taken. The Hebrew words support a single small part that could regenerate - exactly what the last rib in man does the ONLY part of man that regrow by itself.

Note also a very important aspect. Adam was first, indicating a level of privilege and authority. In YHWH's council there is a clear hierarchical order, Was it communicated through this event that a similar hierarchical relationship has to be honoured in human relations?

Adam was the ONLY one that were informed about the deadly danger of the tree of knowledge. He was the "custodian"of the tree.

Note: A paternalistic man-only, women suppressed and dispised, ore- New Covenant world is NOT proposed at all. However, in the New, a wife is instructed to submit to the husband, BUT, earstwhile notion of an authoritarian, autocratic, totalitarian rule of the husband over his wife (and anyone besides) has been dealt a deadly blow in YESHUA - the husband is to respect the wife as YESHUA values and respects His ecclesia - and died for it.

IF Adam and Eve were equal in partnership, why was the curses given not equal? The narrative does not support a 50/50 share in responsibility, and rather runs parallel to the fallen heavenly beings that moved from under their hierarchical position to one that they were never created to have. Authoroty structures have been violated.

Throughout the Old Covenant we see the structure maintained between men and woman. Much could be said about women (doing the study - it is huge) but nowhere it is suggested that man and woman are at the same level.

According to the pattern of what happened in the spirit realm, when one lower than YHWH wanted to move above, the nacash approached Eve, the helper, subservient to Adam, to negotiate deliberate about the fruit. A dangerous endeavour for Eve. But equally damning was the inaction of Adam. He was instructed to guard the garden - he had all the authority to command the nacash to leave and never return. He did not prevent Eve from taking the fruit and eat, and weakly, accepted the fruit from her to eat. He was with her when she ate the fruit.

Dangerous when someone in authority abdicates explicitly assigned responsibility, transfer authority to one lower in the hierarchy, and submitting to that new authority.

Also note the judgment. She would have much more sorrow and pain when pregnant and in delivery, AND her dependence on and attachment to her husband, how domineering, selfish and unsimpathetic he may be - he will rule over her. She became his inferior, he being lord and master. Bitter amongst the heathen, being reduced to a degraded position, the property of the husband. Worse than that amongst the Jews, nevertheless was bought from the father and could be divorced at will, not having property, nor having means of an income.

Did her times in the month where she was unclean, and "polluted" everything on which she sat part of this punishment?

The depth from which YESHUA lifted women into the New Covenant is breathtakingly deep. How cheap man reduced salvation, how insignificant the words of Christ on the cross were made.

Refer to Barnes on Gal 3:28.

There is a word "ala" in Hebrew, be it has apparently a wildly different meaning than that of Aramaic. It is dishonest and deceiptive,

The word that they ignored was what YHWH did AFTER He removed part of Adam. Cagar CANNOT be associated with a complete side "operation", as that would mean a new creation of that part not to leave Adam non-functional.

This is a very sure sign that a hidden, and wicked agenda is followed - one that fits perfectly within the current woke framework - the fluidity of gender, and mutulation of children to fit in with the gender mess in the (fallen) spirit realm.

For this reason, as we humans are made in the image of YHWH, one would expect some similarity in authority hierarchies throughout the Bible.There was not enough time to follow through with all the supporting scriptures - which will be done in the more complete study. However, consider the messenger to Daniel and the prince of Persia who resisted him, one of several examples.

Also, Isa 14 decribes an original rebel that wanted to destroy the structures that YHWH has established from the beginning. Is this what the video want to accomplish as well?

IMHO - yes.